Evaluation of genotypic tropism prediction tests compared with in vitro co-receptor usage in HIV-1 primary isolates of diverse subtypes.

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of genotypic methods for predicting the co-receptor usage of subtypes B and non-B HIV-1 primary isolates, using as gold standard the infectivity of each primary isolate in GHOST cells stably expressing HIV-1 co-receptors. METHODS Primary isolates were obtained by co-culturing either patient's peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) or ultracentrifuged plasma with donor-activated PBMCs. In vitro co-receptor usage was determined by infecting GHOST cells. Tropism prediction, based on V3 sequences, was determined with simple rules and bioinformatic tools (Geno2pheno[coreceptor] and WebPSSM). RESULTS This study includes 102 HIV-1 primary isolates; 23 (22.5%) subtype B and 79 (77.5%) non-B genetic forms. V3 sequences were classified into six subtypes (A-G), although 32 (31.4%) were circulating recombinant forms and 21 (20.6%) were unique recombinant forms. Sixty-nine isolates were R5, 27 R5X4 and 6 X4. The highest levels of sensitivity and specificity for the detection of X4 strains among V3 sequences, between 91% and 100%, were obtained by using PSSM(x4r5), PSSM(si/nsi) and the 11/25 rule for sequences of subtypes A, B and G, but not for subtype F. Establishing the recommended cut-off for clinical settings of a 10% false positive rate for Geno2pheno, we obtained 93% specificity and 97% sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS Comparing genotypic assays for HIV-1 co-receptor use with a cell-culture phenotypic assay could provide more reliable results of sensitivity and specificity for the detection of X4 strains than comparing them with recombinant assays, considered as gold standard. In general, except for subtype F isolates, there is a good correlation for tropism prediction.